Sushi Tray Supply: PP vs PS vs Bagasse

Sushi Tray Supply: PP vs PS vs Bagasse

Material comparison

PPPSBagasse
Clarityclear grades availableexcellentnone
Cold displaygoodexcellentgood
Grease resistancegoodgoodneeds coating
Compostablenonoyes
Cost index10095130–160
Moisturelow absorptionlowabsorbs if uncoated

Why PS is still common

PS is cheaper and clearer than PP for cold applications. It has one weakness that matters in sushi: it is brittle. A dropped PS tray cracks; a PP tray flexes. For delivery-heavy sushi programs, PP is the safer choice despite the cost.

PS also fails the sustainability conversation entirely and is banned for food service in several jurisdictions. Check the destination market before specifying.

The lid is the product

In sushi, the customer buys with their eyes. Lid options:

LidEffect
Anti-fog PETclear, no droplets, cracks if dropped
Anti-fog PPclear-ish, durable
Dome PPmore headspace, less condensation on the food
Bagasse windowcompostable claim, limited clarity

Anti-fog matters more in sushi than in any other category — a fogged lid hides the product entirely.

FAQ

Is bagasse suitable for sushi? Only with a grease-resistant coating; uncoated bagasse absorbs soy sauce and softens.

What size trays are standard? Common footprints align to half or third of a 1/1 gastronorm tray (530 × 325 mm).

Next step

Tell us chilled retail or delivery, and whether a compostable claim is required. We will match material and lid to the display conditions.

Related reading

Models covered on this site: 550 ml PF-NT176-1 · 500 ml PF-SQ500 · 470 ml PF-520 · see all models in this category.

Looking for a PP food container manufacturer?

We manufacture PP lunch boxes, bowls, compartment containers and sauce cups in Guangdong, China with OEM and IML printing service. Get a quote today.

Get Free Quote → Browse Products